For a period of a month, the employees from all subdivisions of the Border Police shall be trained in the framework of training courses, on increasing efficiency in preventing and combating corruption. Training sessions take place at the initiative of the Border Police with the support of the National Anticorruption Center.
The main objective in conducting this training is to familiarize the participants with Law no. 325 of 23 December 2013 on professional integrity testing, which sets the goal, the principles, the means, the methods, the procedures and the legal consequences of the testing of the professional integrity in public entities.
Today, the decision making factors of the Border Police Department attended such a course, where they learned about the testing procedure of the professional integrity, the rights and the obligations of the public servants and the need for their implementation in each state institution The participants also discussed issues relating to integrity, morality, ethics and professional conduct, the benefits of the rules of conduct, specific risks and vulnerabilities to corruption specific for the institution, the responsibility for ethical violations and acts of corruption, etc. ..
In the framework of the training course participated the Deputy Head of the Border Police Department Ianuş Erhan, who thanked the colleagues from the National Anticorruption Center for their support in the implementation and appliance of the law on testing professional integrity and expressed the hope that the cooperation relationships between institutions to have a continuity.
NOTE: Since August 14, the National Anticorruption Center shall carry on professional integrity tests of the employees of the public institutions. The professional integrity testing is performed for ensuring professional integrity and preventing and combating corruption in public entities; verification of the compliance by public officials of the obligations and duties and rules of conduct; identification, assessment and elimination of vulnerabilities and risks that could cause or encourage corruption, corruption related acts or acts of corrupt behavior; inadmissibility of some irrelevant influences in carrying out of obligations or duties of the public officials.
